Pentagon locks in 10-year F-35 jet deal
The $7 billion Lockheed is putting up is the detail that catches my eye. Defense contractors usually get paid to build jets, not write checks to help fund the program. That suggests the Pentagon wanted a partner with real skin in the game, rather than a vendor collecting invoices.
The 850-jet commitment over a decade is a big bet on a plane with a rocky past. Cost overruns and maintenance issues have plagued the F-35. Locking in these numbers means both sides believe the worst is over. I'm not sure that's wise, but the alternative of starting over seems worse.
I'd want to know what those $7 billion in initiatives actually fund. Is it engine fixes, software upgrades, or something else? The real test is whether the jets arrive on time and work as promised. A decade is a long commitment, and with adversaries catching up, the Pentagon chose to stick with the F-35. That's a decision worth watching, but I'll wait to see the first deliveries before cheering.
