RunInfra
The whole pitch is three words long, and that tells you a lot about where the market is going right now. "Open models, built for agents" would have sounded niche a year ago, now it sounds like the center of gravity. I like that they're leading with openness, because agent tooling is getting crowded and the lock-in question is real. If you're building agents, do you want to be stuck with someone else's rate limits and roadmap? A lot of founders I talk to are saying no.
What I'd want to know next is the actual substance. Is RunInfra a model provider, a hosting layer, an orchestration tool, or all of the above? The name hints at infrastructure, which could mean they're solving the messy part of running these models reliably at scale. That's where the value is, but also where the operational pain lives. I'm curious whether they're targeting solo devs experimenting or enterprises that need serious guarantees.
I'll admit my confidence is low because the details are thin. But the direction feels right. Open models have momentum, and agents might be the use case that pushes them into production everywhere. If RunInfra can make that pairing genuinely easy, they've picked a good lane.